Ant Intelligence

When we think of intelligent members of the animal kingdom, the creatures that spring immediately to mind are apes and monkeys. But in fact the social lives of some members of the insect kingdom are sufficiently complex to suggest more than a hint of intelligence. Among these, the world of the ant has come in for considerable scrutiny lately, and the idea that ants demonstrate sparks of cognition has certainly not been rejected by those involved in these investigations.

Ants store food, repel attackers and use chemical signals to contact one another in case of attack. Such chemical communication can be compared to the human use of visual and auditory channels (as in religious chants, advertising images and jingle s, political slogans and martial music) to arouse and propagate moods and attitudes. The biologist Lewis Thomas wrote, Ants are so much like human beings as to be an embarrassment. They farm fungi, raise aphids* as livestock, launch armies to war, use chemical sprays to alarm and confuse enemies, capture slaves, engage in child lab our, exchange information ceaselessly. They do everything but watch television.'

However, in ants there is no cultural transmission -everything must be encoded in the genes - whereas in humans the opposite is true. Only basic instincts are carried in the genes of a newborn baby, other skills being learned from others in the community as the child grows up. It may seem that this cultural continuity gives us a huge advantage over ants. They have never mastered fire nor progressed. Their fungus farming and aphid herding crafts are sophisticated when compared to the agricultural skills of humans five thousand years ago but been totally overtaken by modern human agribusiness.

Or have they? The farming methods of ants are at least sustainable. They do not ruin environments or use enormous amounts of energy. Moreover, recent evidence suggests that the crop farming of ants may be more sophisticated and adaptable than was thought.

Ants were farmers fifty million years before humans were. Ants can't digest the cellulose in leaves - but some fungi can. They therefore cultivate these fungi in their nests, bringing them leaves to feed on, and then use them as a source of food. Farmer ants secrete antibiotics to control other fungi that might ac t as 'weeds', and spread waste to fertilize the crop.

It was once thought that the fungus that ants cultivate was a single type that they had propagated, essentially unchanged from the distant past. Not so. Ulrich Mueller of Maryland and his colleagues genetically screened 8 62 different types of fungi taken from ants' nests. These turned out to be highly perse: it seems that ants are continually domesticating new species. Even more impressively, DNA analysis of the fungi suggests that the ants improve or modify the fungi by regularly swapping and sharing strains with neighbouring ant colonies.

Whereas prehistoric man had no exposure to urban lifestyles - the forcing house of intelligence - the evidence suggests that ants have lived in urban settings for close on a hundred million years, developing and maintaining underground cities of specialised chambers and tunnels.

When we survey Mexico City, Tokyo, Los Angeles, we are amazed at what has been accomplished by humans. Yet Hoelldobler and Wilson's magnificent work for ant lovers, The Ants, describes a supercolony of the ant Formica yessensis on the Ishikari Coast of Hokkaido. This 'megalopolis' was reported to be compose d of 360 million workers and a million queens living in 4, 500 interconnected nests a cross a territory of 2.7 square kilometres.

Such enduring and intricately meshed levels of technical achievement outstrip by far anything achieved by our distant ancestors. We hail as masterpieces the cave paintings in southern France and elsewhere, dating back some 20,000 years. Ant societies existed in something like their present form more than seventy million years ago. Beside this, prehistoric ma n looks technologically primitive. Is this then some kind of intelligence, albeit of a different kind?

Research conducted at Oxford, Sussex and Zurich Universities has shown that when desert ants return from a foraging trip, they navigate by integrating bearings and distances, which they continuously update in their heads. They combine the evidence of visual landmarks with a mental library of local directions, all within a framework which is consulted and updated. So ants can learn too.

And in a twelve-year programmed of work, Ryabko and Reznikova have found evidence that ants can transmit very complex messages. Scouts who had located food in a maze returned to mobilise their foraging teams. They engaged in contact sessions, at the end of which the scout was removed in order to observe what her team might do. Often the foragers proceeded to the exact spot in the maze where the food had been. Elaborate precautions were taken to prevent the foraging team using odor clues. Discussion now centres on whether the route through the maze is communicated as a 'left-right' sequence of turns or as a 'compass bearing and distance ' message.

During the course of this exhaustive study, Reznikova has grown so attached to her laboratory ants that she feels she knows them as inpiduals - even without the paint spots used to mark them. It's no surprise that Edward Wilson, in his essay, 'In the company of ants', advises readers who ask what to do with the ants in their kitchen to: 'Watch where you step. Be careful of little lives.'

Questions 1-6

Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 1? In boxes 1-6 on your answer sheet, write
TRUE if the statement agrees with the information
FALSE if the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this in the passage

1. Ants use the same channels of communication as humans do.
2. City life is one factor that encourages the development of intelligence.
3. Ants can build large cities more quickly than humans do.
4. Some ants can find their way by making calculations based on distance and position.
5. In one experiment, foraging teams were able to use their sense of smell to find food.
6. The essay, 'In the company of ants', explores ant communication.
Questions 7-13

Complete the summary using the list of words, A-O, below.

Write the correct letter, A-O, in boxes 7-13 on your answer sheet.

A. aphids
B. agricultural
C. cellulose
D. exchanging
E. energy
F. fertilizers
G. food
H. fungi
I. growing
J. growing
K. natural
L. other species
M. secretions
N. sustainable
O. environment
7. 7
7
8. 8
8
9. 9
9
10. 10
10
11. 11
11
12. 12
12
13. 13
13
我的答案
1.
未作答
2.
未作答
3.
未作答
4.
未作答
5.
未作答
6.
未作答
正确答案
1.
FALSE
2.
TRUE
3.
NOT GIVEN
4.
TRUE
5.
FALSE
6.
NOT GIVEN
题目解析

题目定位词:channel of communication, humans
考点词:the same
答案位置:第2段第2句
题解:可先定位到文章第2段第2句。 题目中的human一词并未替换。 channel of communication在文章中变化也不大。此时可变化的词只有the same。在文章中并未找到其同义替换的对应词。但文章中具体说到蚂蚁使用的是 chemical communication,人类使用visual和auditory channel。 且文章中be compared to与题目中the same不符。本题答案为FALSE。

题目定位词:city life, intelligence
考点词:encourage
答案位置:第7段第1句
题解:可通过city life一词定位到文章第 7段第1句。句中urban lifestyle是该词的对应。破折号后面的the forcing house对应encourage。 Intelligence未发生变化。关键词全部找到,且逻辑关系未变化。本题答案为TRUE。

题目定位词:large cities
考点词:more quickly than humans
答案位置:第8段第3句
题解:沿上题答案向后,在第8段提到 megalopolis与large cities有关, 但该句周围只详细介绍其规模, 并未提到建设速度,也未与人类比较。more quickly than humans 并未在文章中提到。注意:第9段中出现了与人类的对比,但是从时间先后和技术手段比较,与速度无关。不可自行联想错误推断。本题答案为NOT GIVEN。

题目定位词:find their way; calculation
考点词:based on distance and position
答案位置:倒数第3 段第1句
题解:通过making calculation定位到该段。题目中的distance在文章中未替换,题目中position在文章中替换成bearings。Integrating 则对应文章中的calculation。所有的细节全部找到,逻辑关系并未变化。本题答案为TRUE。

题目定位词:foraging teams, sense of smell
考点词:able, find food
答案位置:倒数第2 段倒数第2句
题解:通过foraging teams定位到该段。 然后通过smell一词定到该句。 smell对应句中的odour. 在该句文章中找到prevent…using…,与题 目中的were able to use相矛盾。本题答案为FALSE。

题目定位词:the essay “In the company of ants”
考点词:explore ant communication
答案位置:文章最后1句
题解:通过引号中的论文题目定位到最后1 句。本句只说到该作者的建议,并未提到ant communication。本题答案为NOT GIVEN。

正确
错误
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
< 上一题
下一题 >
备考规划