Crop-growing skyscrapers
By the year 2050, nearly 80% of the Earth’s population will live in urban centres. Applying the most conservative estimates to current demographic trends, the human population will increase by about three billion people by then. An estimated 109 hectares of new land (about 20% larger than Brazil) will be needed to grow enough food to feed them, if traditional farming methods continue as they are practised today. At present, throughout the world, over 80% of the land that is suitable for raising crops is in use. Historically, some 15% of that has been laid waste by poor management practices. What can be done to ensure enough food for the world’s population to live on?
The concept of indoor farming is not new, since hothouse production of tomatoes and other produce has been in vogue for some time. What is new is the urgent need to scale up this technology to accommodate another three billion people. Many believe an entirely new approach to indoor farming is required, employing cutting-edge technologies. One such proposal is for the ‘Vertical Farm’. The concept is of multi-storey buildings in which food crops are grown in environmentally controlled conditions. Situated in the heart of urban centres, they would drastically reduce the amount of transportation required to bring food to consumers. Vertical farms would need to be efficient, cheap to construct and safe to operate. If successfully implemented, proponents claim, vertical farms offer the promise of urban renewal, sustainable production of a safe and varied food supply (through year-round production of all crops), and the eventual repair of ecosystems that have been sacrificed for horizontal farming.
It took humans 10,000 years to learn how to grow most of the crops we now take for granted. Along the way, we despoiled most of the land we worked, often turning verdant, natural ecozones into semi-arid deserts. Within that same time frame, we evolved into an urban species, in which 60% of the human population now lives vertically in cities. This means that, for the majority, we humans have shelter from the elements, yet we subject our food-bearing plants to the rigours of the great outdoors and can do no more than hope for a good weather year. However, more often than not now, due to a rapidly changing climate, that is not what happens. Massive floods, long droughts, hurricanes and severe monsoons take their toll each year, destroying millions of tons of valuable crops.
The supporters of vertical farming claim many potential advantages for the system. For instance, crops would be produced all year round, as they would be kept in artificially controlled, optimum growing conditions. There would be no weather-related crop failures due to droughts, floods or pests. All the food could be grown organically, eliminating the need for herbicides, pesticides and fertilisers. The system would greatly reduce the incidence of many infectious diseases that are acquired at the agricultural interface. Although the system would consume energy, it would return energy to the grid via methane generation from composting nonedible parts of plants. It would also dramatically reduce fossil fuel use, by cutting out the need for tractors, ploughs and shipping.
A major drawback of vertical farming, however, is that the plants would require artificial light. Without it, those plants nearest the windows would be exposed to more sunlight and grow more quickly, reducing the efficiency of the system. Single-storey greenhouses have the benefit of natural overhead light; even so, many still need artificial lighting.
A multi-storey facility with no natural overhead light would require far more. Generating enough light could be prohibitively expensive, unless cheap, renewable energy is available, and this appears to be rather a future aspiration than a likelihood for the near future.
One variation on vertical farming that has been developed is to grow plants in stacked trays that move on rails. Moving the trays allows the plants to get enough sunlight. This system is already in operation, and works well within a single-storey greenhouse with light reaching it from above: it Is not certain, however, that it can be made to work without that overhead natural light.
Vertical farming is an attempt to address the undoubted problems that we face in producing enough food for a growing population. At the moment, though, more needs to be done to reduce the detrimental impact it would have on the environment, particularly as regards the use of energy. While it is possible that much of our food will be grown in skyscrapers in future, most experts currently believe it is far more likely that we will simply use the space available on urban rooftops.
Complete the sentences below.
Choose NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS from the passage for each answer.
Write your answers in boxes 1-7 on your answer sheet.
题目关键词:food plants, indoors
答案位置:第 2 段第 3 行
题解:题目:有些食用植物,包括……,已经有在室内种植了。
此处要填的是名词,为 food plants 中的一种。通过 indoors 一词定位到第 2 段第 1 句 :室内种植的概念 is not new,因为 tomatoes 和其他产品的室内种植已经流行一段时间了。 所以 tomatoes 就是举例的食用植物。
题目关键词:Vertical farms, located in
答案位置:第 2 段第 16 行
题解:题目:垂直农场将坐落于……,意味着会减少长途运输给顾客的需求。
此处要填的是 vertical farms(垂直农场)坐落的地理位置。 通过 Vertical farms 一词定位到第 2 段该词之后的句子,原文 situated in 替换题目中的 located in,接下来就是地理位置。意思是坐落于城市中心,将会大幅减少运输给顾客的需求。所以答案就是 urban centres。
题目关键词:methane
答案位置:第 4 段倒数 第 6 行
题解:题目:垂直农场可以使用来自植物和动物的甲烷去生产……
通过专有名词 methane(甲烷)定位到第 4 段该词出现位置,原文意思:尽管这个系统会消耗能量,它将通过来自植物不可食用的部分所产生的 methane 转变为 energy(能量),再传给 grid(电网)。所以 methane 能产生的就是答案 energy。
题目关键词:cut, agriculture vehicles, unnecessary
答案位置:第 4 段倒数第 3 行
题解:题目:…… 的消耗会 cut ( 注意下降、减少的替换词),因为不需要农业车辆(vehicles)。
通过 agriculture vehicles 的相关表达定位到第 4 段最后 1 句,原文意思 :减少对拖拉机、犁地机和船运的需求,也将大幅度减少化石燃料 (reduce fossil fuel) 的使用。所以答案就是 fossil fuel。
题目关键词:light, disadvantage
答案位置:第 5 段第 3 行
题解:题目:垂直农场需要……light 是个缺点。
通过 light 一词定位到第 5 段的第 1 句话, 提到 drawback( 缺 点 ) 也就是题目中的 disadvantage 是需要人造光(artificial light)。 所以答案就是 artificial。
题目关键词:planting in, not fixed
答案位置:第 6 段第 3 行
题解:题目:垂直农业的一种形式是植物生长在可移动的(not fixed)……
注意在文中寻找植物生长的方式:垂直农业 的一种变体是将植物种在叠起的托盘上,这个是可以在轨道上移动的(move on rails)。所以答案是 (stacked) trays。
题目关键词:most probable, towns and cities
答案位置:第 7 段最后 1 行
题解:题目 :食物生长在城镇的……是最可能的发展。
文中没出现原词 most probable,却出现了其替换词 far more likely(最可能的):目前多数专家认为使用都市建筑的屋顶来种植作物更为可能。所以答案为 (urban) rooftops。
