Why we need to protect polar bears
Polar bears are being increasingly threatened by the effects of climate change, but their disappearance could have far-reaching consequences. They are uniquely adapted to the extreme conditions of the Arctic Circle, where temperatures can reach -40°C. One reason for this is that they have up to 11 centimetres of fat underneath their skin. Humans with comparative levels of adipose tissue would be considered obese and would be likely to suffer from diabetes and heart disease. Yet the polar bear experiences no such consequences.
A 2014 study by Shi Ping Liu and colleagues sheds light on this mystery. They compared the genetic structure of polar bears with that of their closest relatives from a warmer climate, the brown bears. This allowed them to determine the genes that have allowed polar bears to survive in one of the toughest environments on Earth. Liu and his colleagues found the polar bears had a gene known as APoB, which reduces levels of low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) – a form of ‘bad’ cholesterol. In humans, mutations of this gene are associated with increased risk of heart disease. Polar bears may therefore be an important study model to understand heart disease in humans.
The genome of the polar bear may also provide the solution for another condition, one that particularly affects our older generation: osteoporosis. This is a disease where bones show reduced density, usually caused by insufficient exercise, reduced calcium intake or food starvation. Bone tissue is constantly being remodelled, meaning that bone is added or removed, depending on nutrient availability and the stress that the bone is under. Female polar bears, however, undergo extreme conditions during every pregnancy. Once autumn comes around, these females will dig maternity dens in the snow and will remain there throughout the winter, both before and after the birth of their cubs. This process results in about six months of fasting, where the female bears have to keep themselves and their cubs alive, depleting their own calcium and calorie reserves. Despite this, their bones remain strong and dense.
Physiologists Alanda Lennox and Allen Goodship found an explanation for this paradox in 2008. They discovered that pregnant bears were able to increase the density of their bones before they started to build their dens. In addition, six months later, when they finally emerged from the den with their cubs, there was no evidence of significant loss of bone density. Hibernating brown bears do not have this capacity and must therefore resort to major bone reformation in the following spring. If the mechanism of bone remodelling in polar bears can be understood, many bedridden humans, and even astronauts, could potentially benefit.
The medical benefits of the polar bear for humanity certainly have their importance in our conservation efforts, but these should not be the only factors taken into consideration. We tend to want to protect animals we think are intelligent and possess emotions, such as elephants and primates. Bears, on the other hand, seem to be perceived as stupid and in many cases violent. And yet anecdotal evidence from the field challenges those assumptions, suggesting for example that polar bears have good problem-solving abilities. A male bear called GoGo in Tennoji Zoo, Osaka, has even been observed making use of a tool to manipulate his environment. The bear used a tree branch on multiple occasions to dislodge a piece of meat hung out of his reach. Problem-solving ability has also been witnessed in wild polar bears, although not as obviously as with GoGo. A calculated move by a male bear involved running and jumping onto barrels in an attempt to get to a photographer standing on a platform four metres high.
In other studies, such as one by Alison Ames in 2008, polar bears showed deliberate and focused manipulation. For example, Ames observed bears putting objects in piles and then knocking them over in what appeared to be a game. The study demonstrates that bears are capable of agile and thought-out behaviours. These examples suggest bears have greater creativity and problem-solving abilities than previously thought.
As for emotions, while the evidence is once again anecdotal, many bears have been seen to hit out at ice and snow – seemingly out of frustration – when they have just missed out on a kill. Moreover, polar bears can form unusual relationships with other species, including playing with the dogs used to pull sleds in the Arctic. Remarkably, one hand-raised polar bear called Agee has formed a close relationship with her owner Mark Dumas to the point where they even swim together. This is even more astonishing since polar bears are known to actively hunt humans in the wild.
If climate change were to lead to their extinction, this would mean not only the loss of potential breakthroughs in human medicine, but more importantly, the disappearance of an intelligent, majestic animal.
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 1?
In boxes 1-7 on your answer sheet, write
TRUE if the statement agrees with the information
FALSE if the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this
题目关键词:suffer from, health problems, due to, fat under their skin
答案位置:第 1 段第 3— 6 行
题解:题目:北极熊由于皮下脂肪堆积,会面临多种健康问题。
原文并没有直接描述北极熊皮下脂肪厚会不会对它们造成健康问题,而是先说人类如果有相同厚度的脂肪层,会被认为过度肥胖,罹患糖尿病或心脏病,这符合题目中的 health problems。再结合下句转折 Yet 后提到 no such consequences(指代上文人类所患疾病),可知北极熊不会患上这些疾 病,因此答案为 FALSE。
题目关键词:Liu, compared, different groups
答案位置:第 2 段第 1— 2 行
题解:题目:Liu 和同事的调研对比了北极熊的不同种群。
关键词 Liu 很明显,解题重点在于原文对比的是不是北极熊的不同种群。原文提到:对比了北极熊和其最近的近亲棕熊,可见北极熊与棕熊不是同一种群,因此答案为 FALSE。
题目关键词:Liu, first, compare, brown, genetically
答案位置:第 2 段第 1— 2 行
题解:题目:Liu 及其同事是从基因角度对比北极熊与棕熊的第一批研究人员。
原文的确提到 Liu 和同事是在对比 the genetic structure,对应题目中的 genetically, 但本题的另一重要关键词 first 并未出现, 因此答案为 NOT GIVEN。
题目关键词:control, levels, ‘bad’ cholesterol, genetic means
答案位置:第 2 段第 4— 5 行
题解:题目:北极熊有能力通过基因方式控制自己体内“坏”胆固醇的水平。
本题关键词 ‘bad’ cholesterol 在文中原词重现,但出现在答案句的最后,所以注意从本句开头读起,寻找答案。原文提到 Liu 和同事发现北极熊有一种叫做 APoB 的基因(genes),可以减少(reduce)坏胆固醇的水平(level),分别对应题目中的 genetic means、control 和 level,因此答案为 TRUE。
题目关键词:female, survive, six months, without food
答案位置:第 3 段第 5— 8 行
题解:题目:雌性北极熊在断食情况下能存活六个月左右。
关键词在原文比较分散,而且题目中的 without food 在文中的同义替换词 fasting 并不是常见词汇,如果不认识,也可以结合上下两句推断:(1)雌性(female)北极熊秋天会挖掘待产用的洞穴,一直呆在洞穴里,等待幼崽出生;(2)在这六个月(six months) 里,它们自己和幼崽都活着(alive),对应题目中的 survive。而下一句的耗尽(depleting) 了自身储备(reserves)的钙与卡路里表明,它们这六个月里确实没有进食,否则消耗的就不是储备了,因此答案为 TRUE。
题目关键词:bones, female, weak, came out, spring
答案位置:第 3 段最后 1 行
题解:题目:研究发现,在春天爬出兽穴时,雌性北极熊的骨骼非常虚弱。
本题要和上题结合分析。虽然原文并没有明确出现 spring,但上文提及秋天挖兽穴,在洞穴中度过寒冬,根据常识判断,六个月后,确实是春天走出兽穴,那时雌性北极熊 已经耗尽了自身的钙和卡路里储备。而本段最后一句的连接词 despite 表示转折,their 指代题目中的 female bears,即她们的骨骼依旧强壮,骨质密度也高,与题目中的very weak 相反,因此答案为 FALSE。本题属于关键词离答案位置很远或不明确,但如果按文章顺序阅读至此,可以轻松解答题目。
题目关键词:mechanism, bone density, be used by
答案位置:第 4 段第 5— 7 行
题解:题目:北极熊增强骨密度的原理,总有一天也能被人类采用。
本题答案虽然出现在最后一句,但很多关键词是在上文出现的,比如 the mechanism 的 the 暗示了这一原理上文讲过,即本段 第 2 行提到的 were able to increase the density of their bones 对应题目中的 increasing bone-density;而最后一句提到,如果这一原理被我们所理解,那么很多卧床不起的人,甚至航天员,都会受益,这符合题目中的 be used by people one day,因此答案为 TRUE。
