The development of the London underground railway
In the first half of the 1800s, London’s population grew at an astonishing rate, and the central area became increasingly congested. In addition, the expansion of the overground railway network resulted in more and more passengers arriving in the capital. However, in 1846, a Royal Commission decided that the railways should not be allowed to enter the City, the capital’s historic and business centre. The result was that the overground railway stations formed a ring around the City. The area within consisted of poorly built, overcrowded slums and the streets were full of horse-drawn traffic. Crossing the City became a nightmare. It could take an hour and a half to travel 8 km by horse-drawn carriage or bus. Numerous schemes were proposed to resolve these problems, but few succeeded.
Amongst the most vocal advocates for a solution to London’s traffic problems was Charles Pearson, who worked as a solicitor for the City of London. He saw both social and economic advantages in building an underground railway that would link the overground railway stations together and clear London slums at the same time. His idea was to relocate the poor workers who lived in the inner-city slums to newly constructed suburbs, and to provide cheap rail travel for them to get to work. Pearson’s ideas gained support amongst some businessmen and in 1851 he submitted a plan to Parliament. It was rejected, but coincided with a proposal from another group for an underground connecting line, which Parliament passed.
The two groups merged and established the Metropolitan Railway Company in August 1854. The company’s plan was to construct an underground railway line from the Great Western Railway’s (GWR) station at Paddington to the edge of the City at Farringdon Street – a distance of almost 5 km. The organisation had difficulty in raising the funding for such a radical and expensive scheme, not least because of the critical articles printed by the press. Objectors argued that the tunnels would collapse under the weight of traffic overhead, buildings would be shaken and passengers would be poisoned by the emissions from the train engines. However, Pearson and his partners persisted.
The GWR, aware that the new line would finally enable them to run trains into the heart of the City, invested almost £250,000 in the scheme. Eventually, over a five-year period, £1m was raised. The chosen route ran beneath existing main roads to minimise the expense of demolishing buildings. Originally scheduled to be completed in 21 months, the construction of the underground line took three years. It was built just below street level using a technique known as ‘cut and cover’. A trench about ten metres wide and six metres deep was dug, and the sides temporarily help up with timber beams. Brick walls were then constructed, and finally a brick arch was added to create a tunnel. A two-metre-deep layer of soil was laid on top of the tunnel and the road above rebuilt.
The Metropolitan line, which opened on 10 January 1863, was the world’s first underground railway. On its first day, almost 40,000 passengers were carried between Paddington and Farringdon, the journey taking about 18 minutes. By the end of the Metropolitan’s first year of operation, 9.5 million journeys had been made.
Even as the Metropolitan began operation, the first extensions to the line were being authorised; these were built over the next five years, reaching Moorgate in the east to London and Hammersmith in the west. The original plan was to pull the trains with steam locomotives, using firebricks in the boilers to provide steam, but these engines were never introduced. Instead, the line used specially designed locomotives that were fitted with water tanks in which steam could be condensed. However, smoke and fumes remained a problem, even though ventilation shafts were added to the tunnels.
Despite the extension of the underground railway, by the 1880s, congestion on London’s streets had become worse. The problem was partly that the existing underground lines formed a circuit around the centre of London and extended to the suburbs, but did not cross the capital’s centre. The ‘cut and cover’ method of construction was not an option in this part of the capital. The only alternative was to tunnel deep underground.
Although the technology to create these tunnels existed, steam locomotives could not be used in such a confined space. It wasn’t until the development of a reliable electric motor, and a means of transferring power from the generator to a moving train, that the world’s first deep-level electric railway, the City & South London, became possible. The line opened in 1890, and ran from the City to Stockwell, south of the River Thames. The trains were made up of three carriages and driven by electric engines. The carriages were narrow and had tiny windows just below the roof because it was thought that passengers would not want to look out at the tunnel walls. The line was not without its problems, mainly caused by an unreliable power supply, Although the City & South London Railway was a great technical achievement, it did not make a profit. Then, in 1900, the Central London Railway, known as the ‘Tuppenny Tube’, began operation using new electric locomotives. It was very popular and soon afterwards new railways and extensions were added to the growing tube network. By 1907, the heart of today’s Underground system was in place.
Complete the notes below.
Choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage for each answer.
Write your answers in boxes 1-6 on your answer sheet.
题目关键词:increased, between 1800 and 1850
答案位置:第 1 段第 1 行
题目:1800 年到 1850 年之间,伦敦的……极速增长。
原文中 the first half of the 1800s 对应关键词 1800 and 1850,而题目中 increased 在原文中替换为 grew,这一动作的主体是伦敦的人口,因此答案为 population。
题目关键词:make it possible, to better housing in
答案位置:第 2 段第 4 行
题目:建造铁路能够将人们搬迁到……更 好的居住地。
本题要注意两点:对空格的预判,和对上下文逻辑关系的理解。首先,题目中空格前有 in,可预判此处为位置,且是居住条件更好的(better housing)位置。其次,虽然本题的关键词不好定位,但题目上文的人名 Charles Pearson 可以用来定位。原文中提到 Pearson 想解决第 1 段伦敦市拥堵的贫民窟和街道的问题,因此,第 2 段虽然并未提及 better 或它的同义替换词,也可推测,Pearson 的观点中,将伦敦城贫民窟内居住的贫困劳工迁移(relocate)至刚刚修建的(newly constructed)郊区,确实是 better housing;relocate 在题目中被替换为 move,因此答案为 suburbs。
题目关键词:A number of, agree, Pearson
答案位置:第 2 段第 6 行
题目:一些……同意 Pearson 的观点。
原文提及 Pearson 的观点获得了一些商人的支持。题目中的 A number of 对应原文的 some,而 agree with 是 gained support 的同义替换,因此答案为 businessmen。
题目关键词:had problems, needed for
答案位置:第 3 段第 4 行
题目:公司一开始筹集不到项目所需……。
原文中的 organisation 和 had difficulty in 对应题目中的 company 和 had problems,因此下文的 raising the funding 即是公司遇到的困难,因此答案为 funding。
题目关键词:Negative articles, in
答案位置:第 3 段第 5 行
题目:关于项目的负面文章出现在……上。
本题依然可以通过 in 来预判空格应当是文章发表的主体或位置,如报社、杂志等。 阅读原文可知,题目中的 Negative articles 被替换成了 critical articles,而它们是被新闻界印刷发表的(printed by the press),因此答案为 press。
题目关键词:brick arch, tunnel, covered with
答案位置:第 4 段第 8 行
题目:随着砖拱结构的完工,隧道会用……覆盖着。
在原文中定位到 brick arch 时, 会看到 finally a brick arch was added,即题目中砖拱结构的完工(completion),而接着读下去可知,最后覆盖在 tunnel 上的是一层泥土。was laid on 对应题目中的 covered with,因此答案为 soil。
