Palm oil
A Palm oil is an edible oil derived from the fruit of the African oil palm tree, and is currently the most consumed vegetable oil in the world. It’s almost certainly in the soap we wash with in the morning, the sandwich we have for lunch, and the biscuits we snack on during the day. Why is palm oil so attractive for manufacturers? Primarily because its unique properties – such as remaining solid at room temperature – make it an ideal ingredient for long-term preservation, allowing many packaged foods on supermarket shelves to have ‘best before’ dates of months, even years, into the future.
B Many farmers have seized the opportunity to maximise the planting of oil palm trees. Between 1990 and 2012, the global land area devoted to growing oil palm trees grew from 6 to 17 million hectares, now accounting for around ten percent of total cropland in the entire world. From a mere two million tonnes of palm oil being produced annually globally 50 years ago, there are now around 60 million tonnes produced every single year, a figure looking likely to double or even triple by the middle of the century.
C However, there are multiple reasons why conservationists cite the rapid spread of oil palm plantations as a major concern. There are countless news stories of deforestation, habitat destruction and dwindling species populations, all as a direct result of land clearing to establish oil palm tree monoculture on an industrial scale, particularly in Malaysia and Indonesia. Endangered species – most famously the Sumatran orangutan, but also rhinos, elephants, tigers, and numerous other fauna – have suffered from the unstoppable spread of oil palm plantations.
D ‘Palm oil is surely one of the greatest threats to global biopersity,’ declares Dr Farnon Ellwood of the University of the West of England, Bristol. ‘Palm oil is replacing rainforest, and rainforest is where all the species are. That’s a problem.’ This has led to some radical questions among environmentalists, such as whether consumers should try to boycott palm oil entirely.
Meanwhile Bhavani Shankar, Professor at London’s School of Oriental and African Studies, argues, ‘It’s easy to say that palm oil is the enemy and we should be against it. It makes for a more dramatic story, and it’s very intuitive. But given the complexity of the argument, I think a much more nuanced story is closer to the truth.’
E One response to the boycott movement has been the argument for the vital role palm oil plays in lifting many millions of people in the developing world out of poverty. Is it desirable to have palm oil boycotted, replaced, eliminated from the global supply chain, given how many low-income people in developing countries depend on it for their livelihoods? How best to strike a utilitarian balance between these competing factors has become a serious bone of contention.
F Even the deforestation argument isn’t as straightforward as it seems. Oil palm plantations produce at least four and potentially up to ten times more oil per hectare than soybean, rapeseed, sunflower or other competing oils. That immensely high yield – which is predominantly what makes it so profitable – is potentially also an ecological benefit. If ten times more palm oil can be produced from a patch of land than any competing oil, then ten times more land would need to be cleared in order to produce the same volume of oil from that competitor.
As for the question of carbon emissions, the issue really depends on what oil palm trees are replacing. Crops vary in the degree to which they sequester carbon – in other words, the amount of carbon they capture from the atmosphere and store within the plant. The more carbon a plant sequesters, the more it reduces the effect of climate change. As Shankar explains: ‘[Palm oil production] actually sequesters more carbon in some ways than other alternatives. […] Of course, if you’re cutting down virgin forest it’s terrible – that’s what’s happening in Indonesia and Malaysia, it’s been allowed to get out of hand. But if it’s replacing rice, for example, it might actually sequester more carbon.’
G The industry is now regulated by a group called the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), consisting of palm growers, retailers, product manufacturers, and other interested parties. Over the past decade or so, an agreement has gradually been reached regarding standards that producers of palm oil have to meet in order for their product to be regarded as officially ‘sustainable’. The RSPO insists upon no virgin forest clearing, transparency and regular assessment of carbon stocks, among other criteria. Only once these requirements are fully satisfied is the oil allowed to be sold as certified sustainable palm oil (CSPO). Recent figures show that the RSPO now certifies around 12 million tonnes of palm oil annually, equivalent to roughly 21 percent of the world’s total palm oil production.
H There is even hope that oil palm plantations might not need to be such sterile monocultures, or ‘green deserts’, as Ellwood describes them. New research at Ellwood’s lab hint at one plant which might make all the difference. The bird’s nest fern (Asplenium nidus) grows on trees in an epiphytic fashion (meaning it’s dependent on the tree only for support, not for nutrients), and is native to many tropical regions, where as a keystone species it performs a vital ecological role. Ellwood believes that reintroducing the bird’s nest fern into oil palm plantations could potentially allow these areas to recover their biopersity, providing a home for all manner of species, from fungi and bacteria, to invertebrates such as insects, amphibians, reptiles and even mammals.
Reading Passage 2 has eight paragraphs, A-H.
Which section contains the following information?
Write the correct letter, A-H, in boxes 14-20 on your answer sheet.
题目关键词:examples, environmental advantages
答案位置:Section F 第 4 行
题目:列举油棕榈树种植的一系列潜在环境优势
Section F 提及,就算是种植棕榈油导致森林被砍伐的论述也不是看上去那么简单的。 首先,其经济效益极高具有潜在生态好处 potentially an ecological benefit,对应题目中的 potential environmental advantages。具体来说, 一块地生产的棕榈油是其他油的 10 倍,如果要生产 10 倍的其他油,那就需要 10 倍的耕 地,这更不利于环境。Section F 第 2 小节提及的碳吸收能力(sequester carbon)也体现了题目中棕榈种植的潜在环境优势,且都举出了例子,因此答案为 F。
题目关键词:organisation, control, environmental impact
答案位置:Section G 第 1 行
题目:介绍一个控制棕榈油生产环节对环境影响的组织
通过关键词 organisation 容易定位到 Section G 一个首字母大写的组织名称。原文提及这个行业现在由一个名为可持续棕榈油圆桌会议(RSPO)的组织管理(regulated),该组织建立了可持续发展(sustainable)的标准等等,对应题目中的 organisation 和 control environmental impact,因此答案为 G。
题目关键词:examples, widespread, global use
答案位置:Section A 第 1— 3 行
题目:全球广泛使用棕榈油的例子
Section A 提及棕榈油是世界上(in the world) 消耗最大(the most consumed)的植物油,这与题目中的 widespread global use 相对应。原文中接下来举例香皂、三明治和饼干,即为题目中的 examples,题目所有成分都有所体现,因此答案为 A。
题目关键词:a particular species, benefit the ecosystem
答案位置:Section H 第 3— 9 行
题目:提及能使油棕榈种植园的生态系统受益的某个物种
Ellwood 认为 The bird’s nest fern 有希望使得棕榈种植不再是贫瘠的单一作物或“绿色沙漠”(sterile monocultures, green deserts)。这种植物在生态上能够扮演重要的角色(a vital ecological role), 引进它能恢复生态重要性,为很多物种提供家园,都体现了题目中的 benefit the ecosystem,而燕窝蕨即题目中的 a particular species,因此答案为 H。
题目关键词:figures, rapid expansion
答案位置:Section B
题目:说明棕榈油产业在迅速扩张的数字
根据本题型注意事项,题目中的每个成分都应在原文有所体现。根据关键词 figure 可推测该段落应该有不止一处数据。纵观 Section B,棕榈树面积的扩张和产量的增长均以数据来体现,如 6 to 17 million hectares、60 million tonnes 等,而第 1 行的农民抓住机会最大限度地种植棕榈树(maximise the planting),也与题目中的 the rapid expansion … industry 相吻合,因此答案为 B。
题目关键词:economic justification, not opposing
答案位置:Section E 第 1— 2 行
题目:不能抵制棕榈油产业的一个经济上的合理解释
注意审题,justification 表明要给不抵制找个理由,且该理由应当与经济效益有关。在 Section D 中,有学者提及应当完全抵制(boycott … entirely)棕榈种植,但也有学者对此持怀疑态度,因此 Section E 即为不支持完全 boycott 的一些论述,即题目中的 not opposing。当提到对抵制运动(boycott)的一个回应时,棕榈油在帮助发展中国家数百万人摆脱贫困(lifting … out of poverty)的过程中起到了至关重要的作用,这与题目中的 economic justification 相吻合,至此题目中所有成分都有所体现,因此答案为 E。
题目关键词:examples, creature, badly affected, establishment
答案位置:Section C 第 2— 7 行
题目:由于棕榈油种植园的建立而遭受严重 影响的生物的例子
原文提及,资源保护主义者视棕榈种植破坏环境,因为它导致森林被砍伐、栖息地被破坏和物种数量下降(dwindling species populations),这与题目中的 creatures badly affected … 相吻合,而下文中具体提及的濒危物种,如红毛猩猩、 犀牛等则对应题目中的 examples,至此题目每个成分在原文中都有呼应,因此答案为 C。
