The impact of climate change on butterflies in Britain

According to conservationists, populations of around two thirds of butterfly species have declined in Britain over the past 40 years. If this trend continues, it might have unpredictable knock-on effects for other species in the ecosystem. Butterfly eggs develop into caterpillars and these insects, which are the second stage in a new butterfly's lifecycle, consume vast quantities of plant material, and in turn act as prey for birds as well as bats and other small mammals. Only by arming themselves with an understanding of why butterfly numbers are down can conservationists hope to halt or reverse the decline.

Butterflies prefer outdoor conditions to be 'just right', which means neither too hot nor too cold. Under the conditions of climate change, the temperature at any given time in summer is generally getting warmer, leaving butterflies with the challenge of how to deal with this. One of the main ways in which species are ensuring conditions suit them is by changing the time of year at which they are active and reproduce. Scientists refer to the timing of such lifecycle events as 'phenology', so when an animal or plant starts to do something earlier in the year than it usually does, it is said to be 'advancing its phenology'.

These advances have been observed already in a wide range of butterflies—indeed, most species are advancing their phenology to some extent. In Britain, as the average spring temperature has increased by roughly 0.5 °C over the past 20 years, species have advanced by between three days and a week on average, to keep in line with cooler temperatures. Is this a sign that butterflies are well equipped to cope with climate change, and readily adjust to new temperatures? Or are these populations under stress, being dragged along unwillingly by unnaturally fast changes? The answer is still unknown, but a new study is seeking to answer these questions.

First, the researchers pulled together data from millions of records that had been submitted by butterfly enthusiasts—people who spend their free time observing the activities of different species. This provided information on 130 species of butterflies in Great Britain every year for a 20-year period. They then estimated the abundance and distribution of each species across this time, along with how far north in the country they had moved. The data also, crucially, allowed researchers to estimate subtle changes in what time of the year each species was changing into an adult butterfly.

Analysing the trends in each variable, the researchers discovered that species with more flexible lifecycles were more likely to be able to benefit from an earlier emergence driven by climate change. Some species are able to go from caterpillar to butterfly twice or more per year, so that the individual butterflies you see flying in the spring are the grandchildren or great-grandchildren of the individuals seen a year previously.

Among these species, researchers observed that those which have been advancing their phenology the most over the 20-year study period also had the most positive trends in abundance, distribution and northwards extent. For these species, such as Britain's tiniest butterfly, the dainty Small Blue, whose colonies are up to a hundred strong, some develop into butterflies early in spring, allowing their summer generations to complete another reproductive cycle by autumn so that more population growth occurs.

Other species, however, are less flexible and restricted to a single reproductive cycle per year. For these species, there was no evidence of any benefit to emerging earlier. Indeed, worryingly, it was found that the species in this group that specialise in very specific habitat types, often related to the caterpillar's preferred diet, actually tended to be most at harm from advancing phenology. The beautiful High Brown Fritillary, often described as Britain's most endangered butterfly, is in this group. It is found only in coppiced woodland and limestone pavement habitats. It is also a single-generation butterfly that has advanced its phenology. This suggests that climate change, while undoubtedly not the sole cause, might have played a part in the downfall of this species.

All is not lost, however. Many of Britain's single-generation species show the capacity, in continental Europe, to add a second generation in years that are sufficiently warm. Therefore, as the climate continues to warm, species like the Silver-studded Blue might be able to switch to multiple generations in the UK as well, and so begin to extract benefits from the additional warmth, potentially leading to population increases.

More immediately, conservationists can arm themselves with all this knowledge to spot the warning signs of species that may be at risk. The White Admiral of southern England, a much sought-after butterfly, experienced a significant increase in numbers from the 1920s but has shown a considerable decline in the past 20 years. This may be because the caterpillar exists solely on a diet of a plant called honeysuckle. But it is also likely to be due to climate change.

Questions 1-6

Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 1?

In boxes 1-6 on your answer sheet, write

TRUE if the statement agrees with the information

FALSE if the statement contradicts the information

NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this

1. Forty years ago, there were fewer butterflies in Britain than at present.
2. Caterpillars are eaten by a number of different predators.
3. 'Phenology' is a term used to describe a creature's ability to alter the location of a lifecycle event.
4. Some species of butterfly have a reduced lifespan due to spring temperature increases.
5. There is a clear reason for the adaptations that butterflies are making to climate change.
6. The data used in the study was taken from the work of amateur butterfly watchers.
Questions 7-13

Complete the notes below.

Choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage for each answer.

Write your answers in boxes 7-13 on your answer sheet.

我的答案
1.
未作答
2.
未作答
3.
未作答
4.
未作答
5.
未作答
6.
未作答
正确答案
1.
FALSE
2.
TRUE
3.
FALSE
4.
NOT GIVEN
5.
FALSE
6.
TRUE
题目解析

题目:40年前,英国的蝴蝶数量比现在少。


分析:

1. 时间定位:

- 题干"40年前"对应原文"过去40年内"的时间范围


2. 数据对比:

- 原文明确"三分之二蝴蝶物种数量下降(declined)"

- 即当前数量<40年前数量


3. 结论判定:

- 题干"以前比现在少"与原文事实相反

- 数量变化方向完全对立


答案:FALSE


(解析要点:通过数量变化动词"declined"确定时间对比关系,强调数据变化方向的相反性)

题目:毛毛虫会被几种不同的捕食者吃掉。


分析:

1. 关键概念匹配:

- 题干"毛毛虫"对应原文"caterpillars"

- "被吃掉"对应"act as prey for"(作为猎物)


2. 捕食者列举:

- 原文明确列出三类捕食者:

 a) 鸟类(birds)

 b) 蝙蝠(bats)

 c) 其他小型哺乳动物(other small mammals)

- 完全符合"几种不同捕食者"的描述


3. 结论判定:

- 捕食关系与具体种类均得到原文支持

- 无任何矛盾点


答案:TRUE


(解析要点:通过具体物种列举验证"多种捕食者"的说法,强调生态关系的准确性)

题目:术语"物候期"是用来描述生物改变生命周期事件发生地点的能力。


分析:

1. 术语定位:

- 题干"Phenology"为专业术语,原文原词出现


2. 定义对比:

- 原文定义核心要素:

 a) 调整对象:"time of year for activities and reproduction"(时间)

 b) 非调整对象:location(地点)

- 题干错误要素:

 a) 将"时间"篡改为"地点"


3. 结论判定:

- 原文明确限定为时间调整

- 题干地点描述完全错误


答案:FALSE


(解析要点:通过术语定义要素分析,强调"time≠location"的根本性错误)

题目:由于春季气温上升,有些蝴蝶物种的寿命缩短了。


分析:

1. 现象定位:

- 题干"春季气温上升"对应原文"春季平均气温上升(increased)"

- 题干"蝴蝶物种"为讨论对象


2. 影响对比:

- 原文证实影响:

 a) "物候期提前3-7天(advanced)"

- 原文未提及:

 a) 寿命变化(lifespan)

 b) 缩短现象(reduced)


3. 结论判定:

- 存在气温上升的事实

- 缺失寿命变化的论述

- 符合NOT GIVEN判定标准


答案:NOT GIVEN


(解析要点:通过影响范畴区分,强调"物候变化≠寿命变化"的论述差异)

题目:蝴蝶对气候变化的适应是有明确原因的。


分析:

1. 问题定位:

- 题干"气候变化适应"对应原文"cope with climate change"和"adjust to new temperatures"

- 题干"明确原因"为判断重点


2. 科学态度验证:

- 原文明确表述:

 a) "答案尚不明确(still unknown)"

 b) 使用疑问句式表达不确定性


3. 结论判定:

- 题干"明确原因"与原文"未知"直接矛盾

- 科学界尚未得出确定性结论


答案:FALSE


(解析要点:通过科学表述的确定性程度分析,强调"unknown→无clear reason"的逻辑否定关系)

题目:研究中使用的数据来自业余蝴蝶观察者。


分析:

1. 数据来源定位:

- 题干"数据"对应原文"millions of records"

- 观察者描述:"butterfly enthusiasts"和"spend their free time"


2. 身份特征验证:

- 业余性体现:

 a) "enthusiasts"(爱好者)

 b) "free time"(非职业行为)

- 排除专业研究人员


3. 结论判定:

- 题干"业余观察者"表述准确

- 数据收集方式完全匹配


答案:TRUE


(解析要点:通过行为动机分析确认业余身份,强调"free time→amateur"的对应关系)

正确
错误
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
< 上一题
下一题 >
备考规划