Book review: The World of Sugar by Ulbe Bosma
Ulbe Bosma's The World of Sugar is a genuinely global history. Bosma discusses all the sugar-growing places of the world, beginning with Cuba and Java, the largest exporters of the early 20th century. But this is a history not just of cane sugar but also of beet sugar, an equally important form of traded sugar over the last hundred years. Beet sugar is grown mainly in Europe and the United States. It has also been massively subsidised and sold at artificially low prices on world markets, threatening the livelihood of producers of cane sugar.
Bosma's discussion of the sugar market in Britain gives a sense of the book's range. The sweet-toothed British first bought cane sugar from their own slavery-dependent colonial plantations. Following the abolition of slavery in the British Empire, cane sugar was imported to Britain from places which retained the practice, such as Cuba and Brazil. Towards the end of the 19th century, the British started to import beet sugar from continental Europe. Only in the 20th century was there a move to develop a national beet sugar industry.
The book provides a global labour history, investigating the wide range of labour regimes associated with growing sugar. Contrary to popular belief, cane sugar production was never just restricted to large, dedicated plantations owned by rich men. For example, in Java, a huge exporter of sugar in the early 20th century, sugar cane was grown together with rice in an extraordinarily labour-intensive way by small farmers.
The World of Sugar is also a story of similarity and continuity in sugar cultivation. For example, imported labour has been used for much large-scale production. German beet fields employed Polish workers; Mexicans and many others, including Sicilians, were vital to US sugar production. Cane cutting, Bosma shows, remains a poorly paid and brutal business to this day in many places in the world. But as well as this, the book is about the continuity of the use of traditional methods on small farms. In the mid 20th-century, this type of sugar production dominated in South Asia and Latin America.
This is also a history of capitalists and sugar dynasties, as well as corporations that in some cases have remained influential over very long periods. Great firms and great interests have had profound influence on the policies of states. In many places – not just the British Caribbean but Cuba and the Philippines too – a powerful sugar bourgeoisie played a major role in politics and their interests were consequently protected by trade barriers and subsidies. In the battle for control of the industry, it was inevitably the poor countries which came off worse. All this is explored by Bosma with wonderful subtlety and control.
But sugar production was never just a matter of agriculture. It also involved the extraction, close to the place of harvest, of sucrose from the sugar plant, a process which required machinery powered by humans, animals, wind or steam. Further processes involved boiling (from the 19th century, this often involved vacuum systems) and the separation of sugar from other materials in a process known as refinement. From very early on, sugar production was an energy-intensive industrial process, mostly taking place in the countryside and in refineries in centres of consumption, both small and large. The growth of the industry entailed a very rapid diffusion of ideas and techniques from one country to another. Cuba, for example, developed an extraordinarily dense system of railways to transport workers and cane, as well as steam-powered sugar factories. Particular varieties of cane sugar and beet sugar spread very rapidly across the world, in accordance with local needs and demands.
Where once only tiny quantities of sugar could be produced, now new techniques, varieties, fertilisers, irrigation systems and much more have turned gleaming white sugar into a ubiquitous chemical. Over the same time, there has been a massive increase in consumption. Once regarded as a luxury, sugar came to be promoted as a valuable source of energy. But as the consumption of sugar has increased, so has the harm it does, whether to people's teeth or weight. In the face of appalling obstruction from the sugar industry to attempts to reduce consumption, some countries have been forced to tax sugar in order to bring that about. The sugar industry has a history of attacking its critics and, when it comes to obesity, of trying to blame fats, and lack of exercise and self-control. And the recent past has seen worrying new developments in mass sweetening. High-fructose corn syrup made from maize using an enzymatic process invented in Japan in the 1960s has a similar number of calories to table sugar but is far cheaper to produce. It is now widely consumed, having been adopted in the making of soft drinks and a large number of processed foods, and is regarded as a leading cause of obesity.
This is a wonderfully rich book, a model of global history, the history of production and the history of capitalism. Bosma avoids outbursts of emotion, celebratory or critical, even if they might have made his analysis of the multiple tragedies involving sugar all the more powerful. He shows that we could always have done without sugar and that today we have many alternative sources of sweetness. Yet many of the poorest people in the world still depend on it to make a living.
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.
Write the correct letter in boxes 27-30 on your answer sheet.
关键字:reviewer, cultivation, trading of sugar, first
答案位置:第 1 段第 3—6 行
题解:题目:关于第 1 段中糖料作物的种植与糖的贸易,书评作者提出了什么观点?
A. 糖一直在国际关系中发挥着重要作用。
B. 甜菜糖经过人为干预,变得更具国际市场竞争力。
C. 人们认为甘蔗糖的品质优于甜菜糖。
D. 新的糖料种植地区提高了糖的产量。
解析:本题需要针对糖类种植贸易去概括书评人的观点。第 1 段简要介绍了《糖的世界》之后使用 but 转折,表示本书介绍的并非只是蔗糖的历史,也涵盖了甜菜糖(beet sugar)的发展。之后展开阐述,过去一百年中,甜菜糖的发展壮大,通过大量政府补贴(massively subsidised)和人为压低的价格(artificially low prices),成为与蔗糖一样在国际贸易(on world markets)中极为重要的一种糖(an equally important form),还威胁到了蔗糖生产商的生计(threatening…livelihood)。概括可知,甜菜糖百年间在国际贸易中的崛起,对应着选项 B 中的 been made more internationally competitive。选项 A 中的 international relations 文中未提及,故排除;选项 C 中蔗糖和甜菜糖的质量对比文中未提及,故排除;选 项 D 中的新产区固然很像(原文中除了古巴、爪哇以外,又出现了欧洲和美国的描述),但段落主旨并非糖的产量增加,而是除了蔗糖以外,甜菜糖也来二分天下,故排除。因此答案为 B。
关键字:second, sugar market in Britain
答案位置:第 2 段整段
题解:题目:在第 2 段讨论英国糖业市场时,书评作者强调的是
A. 糖的来源如何随着时间不断发生变化。
B. 农业的发展如何影响了糖的贸易。
C. 多年来人们对糖的需求不断增长。
D. 人们越来越支持符合伦理的糖料作物种植方式。
解析:本段主要阐述了英国糖业发展的历史演变,从依赖奴隶的殖民地种植园(slavery-dependent colonial plantations),到废奴之后从古巴、巴西进 口(imported from), 到 19 世纪从欧洲大陆进口(import…from),再到 20 世纪建立起本国的糖业 (develop a national…industry)。综上所述,本段讲述的是几百年来英国的糖来源的变迁,这正是选项 A 中 sources…changed over time 所概括的信息。选项 B 中 developments in agriculture 未提及,故排除;选项 C 中 demand for sugar 未提及,故排除;选项 D 中的 ethical methods 在原文并未讨论,尽管提到奴隶制度和废奴(abolition of slavery)等信息,但并未从道德角度来讲大众支持哪一种种植方式,故排除。因此答 案为 A。
关键字:doing,third
答案位置:第 3 段第 2—3 行
题解:题目:在第 3 段中,书评作者主要是在做什么?
A. 描述一种高效的糖料作物种植方式。
B. 解释为什么大型糖料作物种植园逐渐衰落。
C. 纠正人们关于甘蔗种植方式的一种误解。
D. 评价不同的甘蔗种植方式。
解 析: 本段概述了本书对糖业劳动制度(labour regimes)及小农生产(small farmers)的相关描述。文 中指出,与大众的普遍认知不同(contrary to popular belief),蔗糖生产并非一直局限于富人拥有的大型专门种植园(large…plantations)。继而列举 20 世纪初的爪哇,甘蔗与水稻一起由小型农户 (small farmers) 种植。此处 contrary to popular belief 与选项 C 当中的 addressing a misconception 是同义替换,而该选项中的 the growing of 所指的种植,对应原文提及的大型种植园或是小农种植的方式。选项 A 提到 efficient approach,原文并未探讨方法高效与否,故排除;选项 B 中未提及种植园 declined,也没说原因,故排除;选项 D 当中 different approaches 固然出现 了,但是作者并未 evaluate 孰优孰劣,故排除。因此答案为 C。
关键字:final,overall message
答案位置:第 8 段第 4—5 行
题解:题目:在最后一段中,书评作者认为 Bosma 这本书想要传达的总体信息是什么?
A. 糖是一种有害且并非必需的产品。
B. 需要借助经济手段来控制糖的生产。
C. 糖业工人的工作条件应该得到改善。
D. 对糖进行大规模营销已经造成了灾难性的后果。
解析:本书评在结束了描述糖分的危害之后(第 7 段对牙齿的伤害和导致肥胖症等),书评人在品评作者的写作时提及,如果 Bosma 加入更多情感色彩,兴许会让他对糖业所涉及诸多悲剧的(multiple tragedies involving sugar)分析更具感染力。此时,我们已知糖分的危害性。继而本书作者 Bosma 又指出,其实人类一直都可以没有糖(could…done without),而 且今天已经拥有许多其他甜味来源(many alternative sources)。糖的危害性与选项 A 中的 harmful 符合,而 could…done without 以及 alternative sources 则是该 选项中 unnecessary product 的同义替换。选项 B 中要借助 economic pressure 控制糖业,文章末尾并未提及,故排除。选项 C 中需改善工人工作条件原文中也只是说到了 the poorest people 依旧依靠糖来维持生计,并未做出任何呼吁改善的动作,故排除。选项 D 当中的 disastrous consequences 在原文中是来自糖本身的危害,并非来自 intensive marketing,故排除。因 此答案为 A。


