Roman tunnels

The Romans, who once controlled areas of Europe, North Africa and Asia Minor, adopted the construction techniques of other civilizations to build tunnels in their territories

The Persians, who lived in present-day Iran, were one of the first civilizations to build tunnels that provided a reliable supply of water to human settlements in dry areas. In the early first millennium BCE, they introduced the qanat method of tunnel construction, which consisted of placing posts over a hill in a straight line, to ensure that the tunnel kept to its route, and then digging vertical shafts down into the ground at regular intervals. Underground, workers removed the earth from between the ends of the shafts, creating a tunnel. The excavated soil was taken up to the surface using the shafts, which also provided ventilation during the work. Once the tunnel was completed, it allowed water to flow from the top of a hillside down towards a canal, which supplied water for human use. Remarkably, some qanats built by the Persians 2,700 years ago are still in use today.

They later passed on their knowledge to the Romans, who also used the qanat method to construct water-supply tunnels for agriculture. Roma qanat tunnels were constructed with vertical shafts dug at intervals of between 30 and 60 meters. The shafts were equipped with handholds and footholds to help those climbing in and out of them and were covered with a wooden or stone lid. To ensure that the shafts were vertical, Romans hung a plumb line from a rod placed across the top of each shaft and made sure that the weight at the end of it hung in the center of the shaft. Plumb lines were also used to measure the depth of the shaft and to determine the slope of the tunnel. The 5.6-kilometer-long Claudius tunnel, built in 41 CE to drain the Fucine Lake in central Italy, had shafts that were up to 122 meters deep, took 11 years to build and involved approximately 30,000 workers.

By the 6th century BCE, a second method of tunnel construction appeared called the counter-excavation method, in which the tunnel was constructed from both ends. It was used to cut through high mountains when the qanat method was not a practical alternative. This method required greater planning and advanced knowledge of surveying, mathematics and geometry as both ends of a tunnel had to meet correctly at the center of the mountain. Adjustments to the direction of the tunnel also had to be made whenever builders encountered geological problems or when it deviated from its set path. They constantly checked the tunnel’s advancing direction, for example, by looking back at the light that penetrated through the tunnel mouth, and made corrections whenever necessary. Large deviations could happen, and they could result in one end of the tunnel not being usable. An inscription written on the side of a 428-meter tunnel, built by the Romans as part of the Saldae aqueduct system in modern-day Algeria, describes how the two teams of builders missed each other in the mountain and how the later construction of a lateral link between both corridors corrected the initial error.

The Romans dug tunnels for their roads using the counter-excavation method, whenever they encountered obstacles such as hills or mountains that were too high for roads to pass over. An example is the 37-meter-long, 6-meter-high, Furlo Pass Tunnel built in Italy in 69-79 CE. Remarkably, a modern road still uses this tunnel today. Tunnels were also built for mineral extraction. Miners would locate a mineral vein and then pursue it with shafts and tunnels underground. Traces of such tunnels used to mine gold can still be found at the Dolaucothi mines in Wales. When the sole purpose of a tunnel was mineral extraction, construction required less planning, as the tunnel route was determined by the mineral vein.

Roman tunnel projects were carefully planned and carried out. The length of time it took to construct a tunnel depended on the method being used and the type of rock being excavated. The qanat construction method was usually faster than the counter-excavation method as it was more straightforward. This was because the mountain could be excavated not only from the tunnel mouths but also from shafts. The type of rock could also influence construction times. When the rock was hard, the Romans employed a technique called fire quenching which consisted of heating the rock with fire, and then suddenly cooling it with cold water so that it would crack. Progress through hard rock could be very slow, and it was not uncommon for tunnels to take years, if not decades, to be built. Construction marks left on a Roman tunnel in Bologna show that the rate of advance through solid rock was 30 centimeters per day. In contrast, the rate of advance of the Claudius tunnel can be calculated at 1.4 meters per day. Most tunnels had inscriptions showing the names of patrons who ordered construction and sometimes the name of the architect. For example, the 1.4-kilometer Çevlik tunnel in Turkey, built to pert the floodwater threatening the harbor of the ancient city of Seleuceia Pieria, had inscriptions on the entrance, still visible today, that also indicate that the tunnel was started in 69 CE and was completed in 81 CE.

Questions 1-6

Label the diagrams below.

Choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage for each answer.

Write your answers in boxes 1-6 on your answer sheet.

Questions 7-10

Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 1?

In boxes 7-10 on your answer sheet, write

TRUE               if the statement agrees with the information

FALSE              if the statement contradicts the information

NOT GIVEN    if there is no information on this

7. The counter-excavation method completely replaced the qanat method in the 6th century BCE.
8. Only experienced builders were employed to construct a tunnel using the counter-excavation method.
9. The information about a problem that occurred during the construction of the Saldae aqueduct system was found in an ancient book.
10. The mistake made by the builders of the Saldae aqueduct system was that the two parts of the tunnel failed to meet.
Questions 11-13

Answer the questions below.

Choose NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS from the passage for each answer.

Write your answers in boxes 11-13 on your answer sheet.

我的答案
1.
未作答
2.
未作答
3.
未作答
4.
未作答
5.
未作答
6.
未作答
正确答案
1.
posts
2.
canal
3.
ventilation
4.
lid
5.
weight
6.
climbing
题目解析

题目关键词:Persian, direct, tunnelling
答案位置:第 1 段第 2— 5 行
题解:题目:(使用)……规划挖掘路线 
通过国家名称定位,波斯出现在第 1 段提及“坎儿井”开凿方式的时候,说到会在坡上放置木桩(posts),这是为了在山上能有一条笔直的线路,确保开凿时能沿着这个路径(kept to its route)施工。题目中的 direct 有“引路、指导”的意思,与 kept to its route 为同义替换,因此,用来保持笔直路线的事物为 posts。尽管空格处出现在句首,但本题其他短句均无首字母大写,因此这里也不必大写,答案为 posts。

题目关键词:water, local people
答案位置:第 1 段第 7— 8 行
题解:题目:水流入……为当地人所用 
审题可知,空格处要满足两点要求:第一能容水(water runs into),第二可以供人使用(used by local people);在提到隧道完工之后,提及水流(water to flow)从山巅流入沟渠(canal),这些水资源可供人们使用(for human use)。可知此处能容水、供人使用的是一条沟渠,因此答案为 canal。

题目关键词:vertical shafts, remove, for
答案位置:第 1 段第 6— 7 行
题解:题目:垂直竖井是用来清除土壤并……的。

审题可知,此处应填 vertical shafts 的用途。原文提及隔一段挖一口竖井,在地下的部分,建筑工人会将土壤移除(removed the earth),来建造一条隧道。这与题目中 remove earth 对应。接下来又提及,挖出来的土壤,也是通过竖井(shafts)运送到地面的,而且也能在施工过程中提供通风措施(provide ventilation),而 provide 与题目中的 for 也是一个意思,因此答案为 ventilation。

题目关键词:Roman, made of, wood, stone
答案位置:第 2 段第 3— 5 行
题解:题目:用木头或石头做的…… 
考查材质的题目在填空题中是送分题,审题时看到 made of 或 made from 这种词组,在原文中找到题目提及的材质即可。原文中第 2 段提及在古罗马“坎儿井”的开凿方式 中,竖井配有抓手和脚镫供攀爬,而且上面有一个木质(wooden)或石头(stone)的盖子(lid),因此答案为 lid。

题目关键词:attached to, plump line
答案位置:第 2 段第 5— 7 行
题解:题目:……挂在铅垂线上 
根据题目和图片可知,答案是 plump line 上面挂着的某种物品。原文中提及为确保竖井垂直,古罗马人还在每个竖井的顶部放了一根杆子,在杆上挂了一根铅垂线(plump line),让铅垂线末端的秤锤(the weight at the end of it)保持在竖井的中心位 置。即铅垂线上挂着 weight,因此答案为 weight。

题目关键词:handholds, footholds, used for
答案位置:第 2 段第 3— 5 行
题解:题目:用来……的抓手和脚镫 
此处考查的是抓手和脚镫的用途,在原文中可找到并未改写的关键词 handholds 和 footholds,该句提到,竖井配有抓手和脚镫供攀爬进出竖井(to help those climbing in and out of them),因此答案为 climbing。

正确
错误
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
< 上一题
下一题 >
备考规划