Return of elm: reintroducing the beloved tree to Britain

Mark Rowe investigates attempts to reintroduce elms to Britain

A Around 25 million elms, accounting for 90% of all elm trees in the UK, died during the 1960s and '70s of Dutch elm disease. In the aftermath, the elm, once so dominant in the British landscape, was largely forgotten. However, there's now hope the elm may be reintroduced to the countryside of central and southern England. Any reintroduction will start from a very low base. 'The impact of the disease is difficult to picture if you hadn't seen what was there before,' says Matt Elliot of the Woodland Trust. 'You look at old photographs from the 1960s and it's only then that you realise the impact [elms had] … They were significant, large trees… then they were gone.'

B The disease is caused by a fungus that blocks the elms' vascular (water, nutrient and food transport) system, causing branches to wilt and die. A first epidemic, which occurred in the 1920s, gradually died down, but in the '70s a second epidemic was triggered by shipments of elm from Canada. The wood came in the form of logs destined for boat building and its intact bark was perfect for the elm bark beetles that spread the deadly fungus. This time, the beetles carried a much more virulent strain that destroyed the vast majority of British elms.

C Today, elms still exist in the southern English countryside but mostly only in low hedgerows between fields. 'We have millions of small elms in hedgerows but they get targeted by the beetle as soon as they reach a certain size,' says Karen Russell, co-author of the report 'Where we are with elm'. Once the trunk of the elm reaches 10-15 centimetres or so in diameter, it becomes a perfect size for beetles to lay eggs and for the fungus to take hold. Yet mature specimens have been identified, in counties such as Cambridgeshire, that are hundreds of years old, and have mysteriously escaped the epidemic.

The key, Russell says, is to identify and study those trees that have survived and work out why they stood tall when millions of others succumbed. Nevertheless, opportunities are limited as the number of these mature survivors is relatively small. 'What are the reasons for their survival?' asks Russell. 'Avoidance, tolerance, resistance? We don't know where the balance lies between the three. I don't see how it can be entirely down to luck.'

D For centuries, elm ran a close second to oak as the hardwood tree of choice in Britain and was in many instances the most prominent tree in the landscape. Not only was elm common in European forests, it became a key component of birch, ash and hazel woodlands. The use of elm is thought to go back to the Bronze Age, when it was widely used for tools. Elm was also the preferred material for shields and early swords. In the 18th century, it was planted more widely and its wood was used for items such as storage crates and flooring. It was also suitable for items that experienced high levels of impact and was used to build the keel of the 19th-century sailing ship Cutty Sark as well as mining equipment.

E Given how ingrained elm is in British culture, it's unsurprising the tree has many advocates. Amongst them is Peter Bourne of the National Elm Collection in Brighton. 'I saw Dutch elm disease unfold as a small boy,' he says. 'The elm seemed to be part of rural England, but I remember watching trees just lose their leaves and that really stayed with me.' Today, the city of Brighton's elms total about 17,000. Local factors appear to have contributed to their survival. Strong winds from the sea make it difficult for the determined elm bark beetle to attack this coastal city's elm population. However, the situation is precarious. 'The beetles can just march in if we're not careful, as the threat is right on our doorstep,' says Bourne.

F Any prospect of the elm returning relies heavily on trees being either resistant to, or tolerant of, the disease. This means a widespread reintroduction would involve existing or new hybrid strains derived from resistant, generally non-native elm species. A new generation of seedlings have been bred and tested to see if they can withstand the fungus by cutting a small slit on the bark and injecting a tiny amount of the pathogen. 'The effects are very quick,' says Russell. 'You return in four to six weeks and trees that are resistant show no symptoms, whereas those that are susceptible show leaf loss and may even have died completely.'

G All of this raises questions of social acceptance, acknowledges Russell. 'If we're putting elm back into the landscape, a small element of it is not native – are we bothered about that?' For her, the environmental case for reintroducing elm is strong. 'They will host wildlife, which is a good thing. Others are more wary. 'On the face of it, it seems like a good idea,' says Elliot. The problem, he suggests, is that, 'You're replacing a native species with a horticultural analogue*. You're effectively cloning.' There's also the risk of introducing new diseases. Rather than plant new elms, the Woodland Trust emphasises providing space to those elms that have survived independently. 'Sometimes the best thing you can do is just give nature time to recover over time, you might get resistance,' says Elliot.

* horticultural analogue: a cultivated plant species that is genetically similar to an existing species

Questions 14-18

Reading Passage 2 has seven sections, A–G.

Which section contains the following information?

Write the correct letter, A–G, in boxes 14–18 on your answer sheet.

NB  You may use any letter more than once.

A. Section A
B. Section B
C. Section C
D. Section D
E. Section E
F. Section F
G. Section G
14. reference to the research problems that arise from there being only a few surviving large elms
14
15. details of a difference of opinion about the value of reintroducing elms to Britain
15
16. reference to how Dutch elm disease was brought into Britain
16
17. a description of the conditions that have enabled a location in Britain to escape Dutch elm disease
17
18. reference to the stage at which young elms become vulnerable to Dutch elm disease
18
Questions 19-23

Look at the following statements (19-23) and the list of people below.

Match each statement with the correct person, A, B, or C.

Write the correct letter, A, B, or C, in boxes 19–23 on your answer sheet.

NB   You may use any letter more than once.

A. Matt Elliot
B. Karen Russell
C. Peter Bourne
19. If a tree gets infected with Dutch elm disease, the damage rapidly becomes visible.
19
20. It may be better to wait and see if the mature elms that have survived continue to flourish.
20
21. There must be an explanation for the survival of some mature elms.
21
22. We need to be aware that insects carrying Dutch elm disease are not very far away.
22
23. You understand the effect Dutch elm disease has had when you see evidence of how prominent the tree once was.
23
Questions 24-26

Complete the summary below.

Choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage for each answer.

Write your answers in boxes 24–26 on your answer sheet.

我的答案
14.
未作答
15.
未作答
16.
未作答
17.
未作答
18.
未作答
正确答案
14.
C
15.
G
16.
B
17.
E
18.
C
题目解析

题目关键词:research problems, arise from, only a few, surviving large elms

答案位置:Section C 第 2 小节第 2—3 行

题解:题目:提及由于幸存的大榆树数量太少给相关研究带来的困难。分析:Section C 第 1 小节提及有些老树(mature specimens)在剑桥郡被发现(have been identified),树龄有数百年(hundreds of years old),原因不明;紧接着第 2 小节,Russell 指出,关键是要找到(study)这些树木能够存活的原因。此处的 study 即题目中 research 的同义替换,而后文中 Russell 又指出,研究机会有限(opportunities are limited),因为(as)这类成年的幸存 榆树本就稀少(the number...mature survivors...small)。此处的 mature survivors 即上文指出的树龄数百年的榆树,也就是题目当中的 surviving large elms;而题目中的 only a few 在原文中以 the number...is relatively small 表示;原文中的 as 表示因果逻辑,则是题目中 arise from 的体现。因此答案为 C。

题目关键词:details,a difference of opinion,value of reintroducing, Britain

答案位置:Section G 整段

题解:题目:关于是否值得将榆树重新引入英国的不同观点的细节。分析:Section G 探讨 social acceptance 的话题。对于该话题,两位学者有着不同的思路。Russell 认为这是好事(the environmental case...is a good thing),而其他学者则持保留意见(are more wary)。Elliot 认为重新引种本质上是克隆(effectively cloning),接着他还指出,有时候,最好的做法就是给自然一点时间去恢复…… 时间久了,(这些榆树)也许就能发展出抗病性。这些都是他和 Russell 持不同观点的细节,对应着题目中的 details of a difference of opinion。因此答案为 G。

题目关键词:how,Dutch elm disease, brought into Britain

答案位置:Section B 第 2—7 行

题解:题目:提及荷兰榆树病是如何传入英国的。分析:Section B 提及荷兰榆树病的两次爆发,第一次影响不大,但第二次,一批从加拿大运来的榆木引发了荷兰榆树病大暴发(epidemic was triggered)。接下来详细描述了引进榆木的病菌传播机制——完整的树皮 (its intact bark)成了传播这种致命真菌的榆树皮甲虫 (beetles that spread the deadly fungus)的理想(perfect for)栖息地,而这些甲虫携带的是真菌中毒性更强的菌株(more virulent strain),摧毁了(destroyed)英国绝大多数榆树。这整个传播机制解释了题目当中的 how...brought into Britain。因此答案为 B。

题目关键词:conditions, enabled...to escape,a location in Britain, Dutch elm disease

答案位置:Section E 第 5—7 行

题解:题目:描述英国某地因某种条件而得以避开荷兰榆树病的传播。分析:审题可知,本题有个非常方便区分于其他段落的要点,即英国某地。此外,还需要提及该地点有着某种条件。本文单独说到英国某地的段落并不多,我们先来排除 Section C 提及的剑桥郡(Cambridgeshire)部分,排除原因为,此处虽然确有老树得以存活,但文中表示原因成谜(have mysteriously escaped)。而另外一个满足题目的“地点”条件的段落是 Section E,不但提及具体英国城市布莱顿(Brighton),还说到本市市区现如今(today)约有 1.7 万棵榆树,是当地自然条件(local factors)——来自海洋的强风(strong winds from the sea)使顽固的榆树皮甲虫难以侵袭。满足题目中 conditions...enabled...to escape Dutch elm disease。至此所有信息在 Section E 均有体现。因此答案为 E。

题目关键词:the stage, young elms, become vulnerable to, Dutch elm disease

答案位置:Section C 第 1 小节第 4—6 行

题解:题目:提及榆树苗在某一阶段会变得易受荷兰榆树病侵害。分析:审题可知,本题要重点排查榆树苗的某一阶 段(the stage)易受侵害,结合常识比较容易推理,树苗的某个阶段大概就是它长到多大的时候。原文提及,一旦(once)榆树主干长到 10—15 厘米左右粗时(10—15 centimetres or so in diameter),正好成为甲虫产卵的理想尺寸(a perfect size for beetles to lay eggs),真菌也会随之入侵(for the fungus to take hold)。此处的“一旦”“10—15 厘米左右粗”都在说明树木长到了这个阶段,而后文的 perfect for 甲虫来产卵、传播真菌,对于小树苗来说,就是它们变得脆弱,容易受到侵害的时刻了,对应着题目当中的 become vulnerable to。至此本题所有信息在 Section C 均有体现。因此答案为 C。

正确
错误
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
< 上一题
下一题 >
备考规划